Find bugs that other tools miss
AI-powered deep security analysis that goes beyond pattern matching. We find vulnerabilities that have survived years of code review and automated scanning.
Start ScanningPay only for what you use — no monthly subscription
What we find
Multi-request attack chains
Stored XSS, session poisoning, second-order SQL injection — vulnerabilities that span multiple HTTP requests.
Logic vulnerabilities
Race conditions, authentication bypasses, authorization gaps, and business logic flaws that pattern matchers cannot detect.
Incomplete validation
Your input validation exists but doesn't cover all edge cases. We find what slips through.
Deep code analysis
Cross-function data flows, trust boundary gaps, and security assumptions that no one thought to verify.
Two layers of protection
🔴 Bugs
Real vulnerabilities that can be exploited today — SQL injection, XSS, authentication bypasses, with proof of concept and severity rating.
🟡 Risk Areas
Functions and code paths that aren't bugs yet but could become vulnerabilities — missing validation, unchecked assumptions, trust boundary gaps. Fix them before they become real problems.
Even if your code has no bugs, we show you exactly where to look and what to strengthen.
How it works
Paste your repo URL
GitHub or GitLab — public or private.
We analyze your code
Deep multi-step analysis across your entire codebase.
Get actionable results
Each finding includes severity, proof of concept, and suggested fix.
Pricing
No subscription — pay only for scans you run. Cost depends on your repository size and analysis depth. We show the price after each scan so you always know what you paid.
Cost scales with the number of functions analyzed. Larger repositories cost more but you can limit the scope to specific directories.
Add credits to your account and scan as many repos as you want.
13 Languages
JavaScript · TypeScript · Python · Go · Java · PHP · Ruby · Rust · C# · Kotlin · Swift · C · C++
AssumeBreaker is a security analysis tool that helps identify potential vulnerabilities in source code. Like all automated tools, results may include false positives and are not guaranteed to find every vulnerability. Findings should be reviewed by a qualified developer or security professional before taking action. This tool does not replace a professional security audit.